Genral69 death
Random Gunz
Rise Of Legion.
328
   |
Posted - 2015.06.07 02:11:00 -
[1] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:It's a useless stat, remove it from leader boards and game screen menus.
Maybe then people will stop leaving battles when they go 2-35 and it reflects on their records. Since they know that the amount of deaths they get is unimportant when they no longer see it is what will give them a reason to continue fighting regardless of how much protopussies are on the other team.
And replace it with ISK ratio.
ISK consumed/ISK destroyed.
So let me get this straight. Because you think people leave a battle because they die alot (which may or may not be the case )
There are plenty of reasons such as:
They disconnected
They had to get off
Fatal error
They had enough for 1 day
Or maybe even they did it by accident. YES ACCIDENT and it is possible. I've done it a couple of time . Where there's a situation that you have to commit suicide but press leave battle . I'm getting off track here
My point being that you don't like your KD ratio so you would rather get rid of the idea altogether . I'm quiet proud of my KD as it shows that I'm taking several people down with me.
Also what would be the point in a isk show and tell. If you can count, you can tell if you made profit in that match or not
General limited: warming failure to pay, may lead to death,massive amount of pain or even lose of family. Since 1995
|
Genral69 death
Random Gunz
Rise Of Legion.
328
|
Posted - 2015.06.07 02:17:00 -
[2] - Quote
clown babee wrote:Clone D wrote:Shadowed Cola wrote:I just tire of this topic.
It should be measured by WP and nothing but, everything else is calculated and measured by it, and it's already present on the score board letting you know who honestly contributed the most.
And it can be padded too, just like ISK and KDR can be. Why this topic even needs to be brought up is because of butt hurts hating there own KDR.
So i troll now, because that's all the topic is worth. However WP is weighted by an arbitrary value system. Who can truly look back on the match and say, "The merc with the most WP is the most valuable player," undoubtedly? I see battle-changing events going around me all the time, where the unsung hero would have been rewarded no WP, and more significantly, lost ISK because of a strategic action. Case in point: a single merc holding off a squad of incoming infantry long enough for the rest of the friendlies to secure an objective and improve its defensibility. Perhaps the merc didn't kill a single one of them, but was able to use cover properly to hold them back for an additional 30 seconds before being put down like a rabid dog. Not only may he have been heroic and shown great skill in managing an encounter with multiple targets, but he helped the team and received zero acknowledgement and lost ISK. This is truly the best thing I have ever heard or read. There's no way to measure this but I wish we could. As a Logi I have had fantastic games that resulted in 3-4k wp. that's great for me. but what about my team? they do the work right. my best bro gets 12-15 kills and that only nets 600 wp so i rep him and get 4k? i don't want to hurt my style but i think its a converstation worth having
As a assault myself I would rather you get the majority of the warpoints, for keeping me and the team alive. Yes you most likely will get the most points being a logi but you also have the lowest hp and it takes you a good couple of seconds yo switch from rep tool to you weapon. So therefore I would rather you get more points being the skiny guy keeping the team going
General limited: warming failure to pay, may lead to death,massive amount of pain or even lose of family. Since 1995
|